We envision a future network with hundreds of millions of active endpoints.
This type of questions asks you to say whether you agree or disagree with a given statement and justify your opinion. Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction. Do you agree or disagree?
Provide relevant examples if necessary. Unlike questions that ask you to what extent do you agree or disagree, this question asks you to have a super-clear opinion. For the task above you have two possible options: Introduction Write your introduction in two sentences: Sentence 2 - say whether you agree or disagree with it and extend your opinion: I completely disagree with this opinion and think that job satisfaction is much more important than salary.
This sentence should contain the main idea of the whole 1st paragraph. Use words firstly or first of all to introduce the first reason. First of all, I believe that job satisfaction gives people a sense of fulfillment that no money can guarantee. Sentences - explain the reason.
To explain the reason effectively, you can imagine that your examiner has no knowledge of this subject at all and you have to explain every detail: Sentence 4 - example.
In our case, the task asks you to provide relevant examples: For example, a lot of famous researchers made their career choices not because of appealing wages, but because they were passionate about science.
Sentence 5 - a short summary of your ideas in this paragraph: This statement should contain the main idea of the whole 2nd paragraph. Use words secondly or moreover to introduce the second reason: Secondly, doing what you like keeps you motivated and therefore leads to a career growth.
In other words, there is a strong relation between job satisfaction and productivity. People who love their jobs can easily excel in their fields of work and achieve better results than those, who put salary on the first place.
Sentence 4 - support your idea with an example: For instance, Henry Miller decided to leave his everyday job despite a good wage and ventured to become a writer.
And after enduring years of ups and downs he became one of the most famous and well-paid authors of the twentieth century. Sentence 5 - a short summary of your thoughts in the 2nd paragraph.
Thus, advantages of jobs that keep you satisfied outweigh the drawback of a low salary in a long-term perspective. To conclude, I strongly believe that job satisfaction is more beneficial than high salary because it makes people happy and motivated.An essay is a formal piece of writing which describes, analyses or discusses a particular issue.
The most common types are: Opinion essays. They present the writer’s personal opinion of the topic, supported with examples and reasons. Sep 01, · Hi Daniel, If you don’t mind can you go into a little bit deeper analysis such as a little bit more information on titles #1, #5 and #4?
because I like the way you structured the responses through questions, but I just need a little more help to select and write the essay. Yes, you only discuss the two texts in part one (40 marks). Then in part two (30 marks) the marking scheme says you are not required to make links to the first two texts but you may do if you wish.
After you’ve decided whether you agree or disagree and generated your supporting points, it’s time to start writing your essay. There are a lot of ways to structure your essay, but we’ll use a structure that has been approved by many IELTS examiners to be high-scoring and coherent.
I am often asked whether I agree with the new group selectionists, and the questioners are always surprised when I say I do not. After all, group selection sounds like a reasonable extension of evolutionary theory and a plausible explanation of the social nature of humans.
Write an essay in which you explain how Paul Bogard builds an argument to persuade his audience that natural darkness should be preserved. In your essay, analyze how Bogard uses one or more of the features in the directions that precede the passage (or features of your own choice) to strengthen the logic and persuasiveness of his argument.